Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Before anyone grabs their pitchforks and condemns ad-retargetng, the question has to be asked. How much did the OP pay to use Facebook as a social platform? With that said...

There is nothing nefarious here. This is standard internet marketing efforts.



OP wasn't neccesarily suggestiong anything nefarious, but was curious about the technical details of how this is done -- as are many of us.

Can anyone give a basic technical explanation of how ad retargetting works, of how the information on what you looked at on Amazon makes it to wherever it is that controls what ads you see on facebook?


Basically it works like this:

On amazon up they put an image or other code on their page that generates a random id and stores it in a cookie.

When you're on Facebook the id is passed back to Amazon which can generate an ad based on your history.

It works because the resource loaded on fb and amazon originates from the same domain. Eg. 3rdpartyretargettingadnetwork.com



thank you, this is super interesting.


I used to think this was the case, but I use chrome in incognito mode ( and only for fb!) and I'm starting to get retargeted ads. I suspect they are using some sort of 3rd party on the backend. Moreover, it's not only ads now ... I'm also seeing suggested groups that seem eerily creepy ...


Makes sense. Will disabling third-party cookies, as per relevant configuration in Chrome or Firefox, make this impossible?


> "How much did the OP pay to use Facebook as a social platform?"

Spare me the "pitchforks".

Nothing is free. We all pay for what appears to be free, the price is just very well hidden in the current case. Advertised products will have the cost of advertisement factored in their price.

I am happy to block these unwanted ads, and to give people the tools to do so. Let's see where the supply/demand curves for ads intersect when you give people the choice.


"How much did the OP pay to use Facebook as a social platform?"

As much as (s)he paid 5 years ago when there wasnt any as-retargeting.


Just like standard AdBlock + Ghostery... and other assorted goodies to block that crap.


Standard adblock would be adblock plus which is tied with advertisers through its infamous "acceptable ads" feature. see: http://www.mobilegeeks.de/adblock-plus-undercover-einblicke-... https://medium.com/surveillance-state/cd2cb53bcaba http://www.infowars.com/google-reportedly-paid-adblock-plus-... http://www.digitaltrends.com/web/adblock-plus-accused-of-sha...

Ghostery works for the advertisement industry by building profile of blocked ads to allow them to tweak the ads so you don't want to block them. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghostery#Criticism http://www.technologyreview.com/news/516156/a-popular-ad-blo...


> Ghostery works for the advertisement industry by building profile of blocked ads to allow them to tweak the ads so you don't want to block them.

From the wikipage and the copy I have installed, it look like only if you enable Ghost Rank. (And as ways to use data goes I can think of worse things than making ads less annoying.)


Yeah, just turn off the "acceptable ads" too.

I used to leave them on, until I learned that they were paid for.


Probably as much as they asked for.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: