What I enjoy about the NYT interactives in particular is not just their technical sophistication (which is formidable given that the creators of Backbone.js and D3 are among their employees) but the sophisticated information design. There's rarely a graphic that is made to show off bells and whistles. The NYT is far and away he closest to embodying the Tufte spirit and thoughtfulness online, given that Tufte has said very little about best practices in interactives
if you'd like a tufte-esque view on interactive graphics, checkout the PhD dissertation from Ben Fry (the creator of the Processing language). I rather enjoyed reading it, and it isn't crazy dense, it was a nice easy read.
I agree entirely. You never see the cliparty slapshy chartjunk that is most of the infographics online. Any infographic from NY Times is designed to show only the data and nothing but the data. For oil prices, a bar chart, not a chart of barrels.
Exactly. Sites like visual.ly are the 99designs of infographics. They're graphic design 101 projects with often misleading/misinterpreted data thrown on a document the size of the moon. They're hard to read and even harder to digest.
