Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | DaedalusII's commentslogin

this post was sponsored by SK Hynix


the biggest problem with claude is it is so negative and tells you things can't be done, are wrong, have hidden problems, etc

I run things through grok to make them positive again after claude does the main work


Grok 4.5 is actually good though (as a workhorse model).


There was a time when life was much simpler. We would all walk a few miles down to the 'station then have breakfast and read the 'paper while the steam smoke hung thick in the air

Then we all had to move to cars. The fire man, stations, engineers, and conductors all lost their jobs, and the commute got 10 times more intense. Now we had to drive our own cars, follow road rules, maintain our cars, and find parking


basal take, completely incorrect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_charitabl...

the US is the most charitable country on earth as a percentage of GDP. There is so much philanthropy that the finance industry is building new businesses just to serve it

https://fintech.global/2026/04/29/the-philtech-revolution-wh...


Does this include giving money to churches in USA?


What if extreme charity is merely sociopathic status signaling?


"A complicated man" is a stupid translation in the first place

Polytropos means: a man of many twists and turns, describing simultaneously a person who has traveled widely and been "turned" by many hardships and places, as well as someone whose mind is clever, resourceful, versatile, and cunning enough to turn any situation to their advantage

Or as W2 academics chasing book reviews and podcasts slots translate: "a complicated guy"

the perfect actor would be someone with james bond spy thriller feeling not commercial guy that has the energy of a little league coach


Every translation has to make tradeoffs. There's no way to perfectly translate a 2500 year old poem whose audience had an almost unfathomably different world view than a modern audience.

Wilson chose to prioritize making the translation uncomplicated and metrical the way it would have been to the original audience instead of trying to capture the full meaning of every single word. No other translation has done that before. They either aren't in meter or they torture the English language into strange and complicated grammar that has a very different effect on the audience than the original would have.

If you want different tradeoffs, then there are countless other translations to choose from. There would be no point writing a new translation if you aren't going to choose different tradeoffs.


It’s a shame Michael Fassbender wasn’t in the running, as his character in The Agency is kind of exactly how I imagined Odysseus: clever, with a heart for the people he cares about but absolutely brutal against people he doesn’t need.


maybe like this, gary oldman 1990s would have been good. there needs to be a feeling of some edge or at least mystery, depth


I think it was more because of the Nolan script. Damon is capable of playing that kind of character; see The Talented Mr. Ripley, for example.


They wrote at length on this particular translation choice: https://emily613.substack.com/p/on-complicated


starlink cellular connection for android in future


you should have a look at proxy firms. you would be surprised


Could you explain to me how an investor owning SPY shares gets to control the proxy vote?

Oh, don't worry. I already know the answer. I'm asking if YOU can tell me the answer.


You can buy IVV instead and get the same exposure but this time you get to vote. Or you could just not own spy and buy the shares individually.


What 401k program do you or your peers have that allows you to buy funds outside of the few, selected by the 401k manager?

I certainly can't buy individual shares in my 401k program. And very, very few programs I'm aware of ever offered that as an option.


You can transfer your 401(k) to an account that will allow you to buy individual shares I did that and bought as many shares as I could in a blue chip tech company. Glad I did because if I had stayed in one of those so called index (all for one) funds my rate of return would’ve been very, very small over the years.

The managers ofsuch funds are lazy and invest in multiple mediocre companies, most of whom produce mediocre returns for example investing in 10 tech companies when only two or three of the companies actually accomplish anything won’t help you in the long-term.

Investing in one or two really good tech companies over time allowed me to retire early.


I certainly can't buy individual shares in my 401k program. And very, very few programs I'm aware of ever offered that as an option.

You can have a 401(k) without your employer. My wife has one and can buy and sell any stocks she wants.


they typically offer a brokerage option. fidelity and vanguard both offered this when I had them. if that wasn't on the table I'd roll it into something that gave me flexibility.


Yes Yes Yes…


that what i mean. where do all those votes go? someone controls them. and those interests are bought and paid for


In practice?

To Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. Who have crafted companies who have virtually no voting rights but get purchased up by the masses through passive index funds.


Homer


much more interesting than the actual article


thats been replaced with spac deals

also: can't pump the ipo and get exit liquidity for vc through a dutch auction


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: